AG v Paisnel
| Jurisdiction | Jersey |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1972 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Ruban v Attorney General
...Att. Gen. v. Contractors Plant Serv. Ltd., 1967 J.J. 785. (2) Att. Gen. v. Makarios, 1979 J.J. 85, followed. (3) Att. Gen. v. Paisnel, 1972 J.J. 2201. (4) Att. Gen. v. Sangan, 1987-88 JLR 196. (5) Corby v. Le Main, 1982 J.J. 157, followed. (6) D.P.P. v. Nock, [1978] A.C. 979; [1978] 2 All E......
-
Snooks v Attorney General
...Cases cited: (1) Att. Gen. v. Heywood, Guernsey Court of Appeal, January 31st, 1972, unreported, considered. (2) Att. Gen. v. Paisnel, 1972 J.J. 2201, followed. (3) Campbell (A.T.) v. Att. Gen., 1995 JLR 136. (4) MacKenzie v. Att. Gen., 1995 JLR 9, dicta of Le Quesne, J.A. applied. (5) R. v......
-
Lapidus v Att Gen [CA (Jersey)]
...had been sitting en Police Correctionelle and he therefore had a discretion to do so if he thought it desirable (Att. Gen. v. Paisnel, 1972 J.J. 2201, applied). (2) The Bailiff had been correct in directing the Jurats that the appellant intended the omission to act on the minds of the minor......
-
Attorney General v Young and Williams
...for the Crown; D.F. Le Quesne for the first defendant; S.J. Young for the second defendant. Cases cited: (1) Att. Gen. v. Paisnel, 1972 J.J. 2201, considered. (2) Snooks v. Att. Gen., 1997 JLR 253, considered. Legislation construed: Royal Court (Jersey) Law 1948, art. 13: The relevant terms......
Request a trial to view additional results